StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Double Jeopardy... Now With Pictures!

9/5/2025

0 Comments

 
Last month, I told you about a proposal that was submitted to PJM Interconnection that would turn MARL into a double-circuit 500kV transmission line between the Fort Martin power station in Morgantown, WV and the new Woodside substation in Frederick County, VA.

Well, PJM has finally posted its new maps and there's one that shows what this NextEra proposal would look like, if you had trouble following along with the narrative I gave you last time.

​Here it is:  
Picture
This map shows a second 500kV circuit beginning at the Fort Martin power station.  A double circuit is just what it sounds like... two 500kV circuits on a common structure.  It is unlikely that the two circuits will be stacked vertically on the structure.  More likely that they will be separated horizontally, with one 500kV circuit on a horizontal arm on each side of the structure.  This is going to change the look of the towers, perhaps their height, and perhaps their width.  It also doubles the amount of power MARL can carry.

The double circuit structures will end at Gore, VA, where NextEra's segment of the project ends.  Because FirstEnergy owns the eastern segment of MARL that continues on from there, NextEra will have to put its second 500kV circuit on new structures on a new 200 ft. wide right of way.  This is an enlargement of the Frederick County section.
Picture
You would still get Gore-Doubs-Goose Creek 500kV on new poles on one side of the existing easement, plus you would get MARL 500kV #2 on a new 200 ft. right of way on the north side of the existing easement.  And don't forget Valley Link, which will add another 200 ft. to all that for its own line of 765kV towers.  Impacted landowners would have not only 1,765kV of electricity added to their properties, but an additional 400 feet of right of way as well.

Meanwhile, at the other end of MARL #2, NextEra proposes to add a new 500kV substation at the point where existing lines feeding from Ft. Martin intersect with MARL #1.  That part of PJM's map doesn't look exactly accurate, so here's my attempt at mapping where the new Sandy Creek substation may be located north of Bruceton Mills.
Picture
Of course, this is going to delay MARL significantly because they're going to have to go back to the drawing board designing the structures.  They're going to have to have new Open House meetings to show you their updated project, too.  And this project is likely to include parts that are ultimately assigned to FirstEnergy, such as expanding the Fort Martin substation.  If FirstEnergy is assigned components of MARL #2, then FirstEnergy would have to start from square one on its part of the project.  The new 500kV NextEra line in Frederick County would also have to start from scratch and hold Open House meetings before filing an application.

So, what happens next?  PJM will be evaluating this proposal (and 133 others around the region) and discussing them at upcoming meetings with the goal of choosing projects by the end of the year.  It's unlikely NextEra will move forward with its application until it knows whether it will be approved to add that second 500kV circuit.

When your friendly, neighborhood land shark... err agent, land agent, shows up to pressure you about signing an easement agreement, perhaps you should be asking him about NextEra's MARL double circuit proposal?  There's more you're not being told...
0 Comments

Double Jeopardy!

8/23/2025

2 Comments

 
PJM Interconnection, our regional grid operator and planner, is always planning something.  PJM regularly presents problem statements to transmission developers and solicits proposed solutions as part of a competitive transmission process.  Each RFP for transmission solutions is called a "window".  PJM presents its problem statement, and willing developers submit proposed solutions.  PJM's competitive transmission windows are what brought us the MARL, Gore-Doubs-Goose Creek, and Valley Link projects.

Once the open "window" closes, developers submissions are posted on PJM's website with a lot of "competitive" information redacted so that only a skeleton of the proposal is available to the public.  These bare bones proposals are turned into maps and tables that PJM's Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee (TEAC) discusses at its monthly meetings with the goal of selecting one of more of the proposals to address the problem PJM described.  The discussion and selection usually takes place over the course of several months, and once PJM's TEAC has selected a project or projects, it must read them into the record twice at committee meetings before submitting them to PJM's Board of Managers for approval.  If PJM's Board of Managers approves the new projects, they are added to PJM's Regional Transmission Expansion Plan (RTEP) and assigned to their transmission developer sponsors.  PJM signs what's called a Designated Entity Agreement (DEA) with the developer and the developer begins routing and engineering studies and eventual public information sessions that they call "Open House" meetings.  This is the exact process that MARL, GDGC and Valley Link have followed.

PJM opened a new competitive window in June of this year to solve a number of problems with the transmission system.  The main problem, as always, is that Northern Virginia demand is skyrocketing due to new data center proposals.  You can look at the factors PJM was considering by reviewing PJM's TEAC meeting slides from last month.  PJM said that some of the lines bringing power from the west would be overloaded in 2032.  Here's one of their maps.
Picture
I will share that PJM's meetings and information are high on the techno-speak level and may appear confusing to most people.

PJM's 2025 Window 1 closed on August 18.  PJM received many new transmission proposals.  Not all proposals submitted will ultimately be selected.  However, we have a first look at what has been proposed so that we can follow PJM's evaluation of these proposals and selection of the projects it wants to move forward.  Here's the full list of proposed projects (expand the 2025 RTEP Window 1 link).  They are simply referred to by number, and each number has a brief description of the project, with much of the specific information redacted to protect competitive information.  The name of the proposer is always redacted, however there's much we can garner out of the information that is not redacted that gives us clues about who may have proposed them.

One of the proposed projects is numbered 896.  This proposal, which may have been made by FirstEnergy or NextEra, calls for turning MARL into a double circuit 500kV transmission line, and adding a second 500kV line to the first segment of GDGC across Frederick County, Virginia.

The proposed MARL double circuit begins at FirstEnergy's Fort Martin power station in Morgantown, WV.
Convert the 500kV single circuit 502 Junction - Woodside 500kV project under development (PJM Baseline Upgrade ID b3800.102) to a double circuit configuration between Fort Martin and the NEETMA/APS interconnection point in Frederick County, VA, to accommodate Circuit 1 (b3800.102: 502 Junction – Black Oak – Woodside 500kV) and Circuit 2 (Fort Martin – Sandy Creek – Woodside 500kV).
The project calls for a new 138kV line from Ft. Martin to a new substation in Mon County that would be called Sandy Creek.  The proposed Sandy Creek substation will intersect with MARL and feed power directly from Ft. Martin to the new 500kV circuit proposed to be added to the MARL project.  The Sandy Creek substation is described:
AC Air Insulated Substation (AIS): New proposed 500-138kV Substation. New 500kV ring switchyard with three (3) line terminals, three (3) 500kV, 5000A, 63kAIC breakers, one (1) 500-138kV, 485 MVA transformer bank.
The new 500kV circuit will be added to MARL's proposed towers so that MARL would consist of TWO 500kV transmission lines, possibly hanging from the same new tower.  The proposer says this doesn't make any difference because MARL has not been constructed yet so they can change the towers and the circuits.
Approved 502 Junction - Woodside 500 kV project (PJM Baseline Upgrade ID b3800.102) has not been constructed so no existing hardware will be impacted.
​The entire circuit shall be upgraded to a double circuit from a single circuit from the point where the Fort Martin - Sandy Creek circuit joins the 502 Junction - Black Oak circuit until the point at which the Sandy Creek - Woodside circuit transitions to single circuit towers. 
This includes the entire portion of MARL from a point in Mon County to the place in Frederick County, Virginia where the MARL project ends and the Gore-Doubs-Goose Creek project begins.  It would impact Mon, Preston, Garrett, Allegany, Mineral and Hampshire Counties.  The proposer says it will use "existing right-of-way" but that right-of-way doesn't actually exist yet and will only exist if MARL is approved and built.  It only exists on paper right now because NextEra has not actually obtained any right-of-way for the MARL project in those counties yet.  Talk about counting your chickens before they hatch, right?
​Existing right-of-way to be used for upgrading the single circuit to a double circuit. ROW Adjustments may be required in specific locations to mitigate engineering and/or operational risks.
Once this new double circuit 500kV line gets to the demarcation point between MARL and GDGC in Frederick County, Virginia, it proposes to run on a new 200 foot right of way for 17 miles across Frederick County until it reaches the proposed Woodside substation owned by NextEra.
The approximately 17-mile route in Frederick County, Virginia travels eastward from the MARL NEET/FE handoff, paralleling the existing Mt. Storm to Doubs 500kV corridor where feasible. The route will have a 200 ft ROW width. The proposed ROW will be an expansion of existing transmission line corridors for approximately 20% of the route length, the remainder will be greenfield ROW.
They can't simply continue the double circuit on the same new towers when they get to Frederick County because that is the point where the Gore-Doubs-Goose Creek line is already planned to be constructed as a double circuit with the existing 138kV line.  The second 500kV circuit would need a whole new right-of-way parallel to the existing configuration.  And don't forget that Valley Link is coming along behind it and creating its own new 200 ft. right-of-way.  Frederick County is looking at not only the new 185 ft. tower for the first 500kV circuit, but the addition of two new lines on parallel rights-of-way that would add 400 feet to the existing 250 foot wide corridor.  Total if this is selected and completed:  650 feet wide right-of-way with three 500 kV lines, one 138kV line, and one 765kV line.  That's a whole lot of power and a whole lot of expansion for Frederick County!
Meanwhile, back in Mon County, Fort Martin's substation must expand for this plan.
Expand the existing 500kV double breaker double bus (DBDB) switchyard by adding (2) 500kV breakers to create (1) new bay with (1) new line position. Replace (9) existing 500kV breakers.
Assumes that fence line must be expanded to west to accommodate upgrades. 
Based on publicly available parcel data and imagery, upgrades are expected to fit on transmission-owner owned property.
The new line from Fort Martin to the new Sandy Creek substation will be constructed for approximately 1-mile and parallels the Hazelton to Lake Lynn 138 kV in Mon County on a proposed new 100 ft. right-of-way.  A second new 138kV line from a nearby substation will also parallel Hazelton to Lake Lynn for an additional 2 miles of new 100 ft. right-of-way.  That's three miles of new right of way in Mon County, and a new substation.

Seems like double jeopardy for impacted landowners, doesn't it?  As if it's not bad enough that MARL is proposed for your property, now the transmission companies want to double your pain with a second 500kV circuit and miles of new right-of-way, and a new substation, in Mon County and Frederick County.

For what?  To get power to data centers in Northern Virginia.

It really emphasizes the fact that these new transmission lines are NOT for West Virginia, and they are NOT needed to attract new data centers in the West Virginia counties they cross.  They are for Northern Virginia data centers, they are not for us!

PJM's TEAC meetings are open to all "stakeholders".  We are all stakeholders in this and anyone may attend the TEAC meetings where these projects are discussed to ask questions or make comments.  PJM TEAC meetings are held once a month, during the work day, and may be attended via Webex or over the telephone.  If you want to attend, you can sign up on PJM's website.  You must have a PJM account and pre-register for the meetings.  If that's not your cup of tea, you can simply get updates from citizens who regularly attend these meetings and save your written comments for PJM's Board of Managers if this proposal is ultimately selected by PJM's TEAC.

Remember, this is only a proposal right now and there is no guarantee it will be selected.  However, MARL and Valley Link were once only just proposals like this, so consider this a heads up on what PJM may be cooking up to invade your community in the future.

Transmission extension cords from West Virginia will never be enough for Virginia's insatiable appetite for electricity and it is expected that PJM's planners will keep adding more and more unless West Virginia stands up and says NO.  
2 Comments

Digging Into MARL

8/8/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
West Virginia's talk news has been all over the subject of the MidAtlantic Resiliency Link, or MARL, for the past couple of weeks.  Despite their heroic efforts, they've barely scratched the surface of the truth about MARL.  It's much more complicated than can be explained on a brief radio show, obviously, and probably more than can be covered in a brief facebook post.  Isn't it time for everyone to dig a little deeper?  I promise it won't be too complicated.  I've learned to distill understandable facts from of the energy industry's big jug o' technospeak over the past 17 years.  This won't hurt a bit!

I'm going to concentrate on a recent MetroNews Talkline radio interview of NextEra's Kaitlyn McCormick.  Listening to it was pretty rough because Kaitlyn kept fading in and out and it was hard to understand much of what she said.  Was she talking on a cell phone while driving through West Virginia's beautiful mountains?  Or was she just waving her phone around while trying to talk on speaker?  Take your pick.  I'm going to use the equally bad transcript to try to decipher exactly what she said.

Let's begin with the fact that MARL is only one part of a larger project approved by PJM Interconnection.  Even Kaitlyn admits that, although the radio hosts insist on treating it like an individual project.  This is a map of the project PJM approved:
Picture
MARL is the light peachy-colored line here that begins at the 502 Junction substation in Greene County, PA and ends just over the state border at Gore, VA.  The blue line is a continuation of the new 500kV line to be built by rival company FirstEnergy.  They are calling their project "Gore-Doubs-Goose Creek" after the substations it will connect.  FirstEnergy's portion of the project begins where NextEra's ends and heads east to continue the electricity extension cord to its ultimate destination, a substation in Loudoun County's "data center alley" called Goose Creek.  Neither one of these projects can stand alone.  PJM needs BOTH of them to be built to deliver this power to a whole bunch of new data centers planned in Loudoun County.  MARL is not delivering power to a data center in Frederick County, Virginia.  It is simply plugging into FirstEnergy's portion of the project in Gore.  If one of these two line segments isn't built, the other one won't be built either.  It's all or nothing because PJM needs both segments to deliver the power from 502 Junction to Goose Creek.

And let's talk about 502 Junction for a moment, shall we?  502 Junction is an existing substation located in Greene County, PA.  Think of 502 Junction as the Grand Central Station of electricity.  It collects electricity generated by plants in the area and re-directs it to new destinations.  Just because 502 Junction is located in Pennsylvania doesn't mean that all the electricity that passes through there is generated in Pennsylvania though.  In fact, most of the electricity passing through 502 Junction is generated in West Virginia!  Here's a map of PJM's transmission system showing 502 Junction and the lines that connect there. 
Picture
This map shows what generators connect to 502 Junction to deliver their electricity for re-direction elsewhere.  To the west is AEP's Mitchell plant.  Connecting from the south is FirstEnergy's Harrison plant.  In Morgantown, lines connect both the Longview and Ft. Martin power generators to 502 Junction.  On its way to the southeast, this project will connect with lines feeding out of Dominion's Mt. Storm power station in Grant County, WV.  That's over 7,000MW of hot, juicy, 100% West Virginia coal-fired electricity, and Virginia's green virtue signaling data center companies are hungry, hungry, hungry for it!

And they're hungry because Virginia has closed down many of its fossil fuel generators that can run when called in favor of intermittent solar and wind projects.  Virginia has closed more generation than they have brought online, creating a power deficit.  In addition, Northern Virginia is practically exploding with new data centers proposed by some of the wealthiest companies on the planet (Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta).  Virginia has no way to power all the stuff it's building.  Virginia just keeps demanding that PJM import more and more power to Virginia, and PJM has only one place to get it... West Virginia!

And this leads us back to WHY PJM Interconnection ordered this project.  PJM did NOT select the two end points for this project.  PJM only selected one, Goose Creek, where the data center load is located.  PJM was open to any transmission extension cords bringing up to 7,500MW of new electric supply from anywhere, as long as it connected to Goose Creek.  It was NextEra who decided that there was an opportunity to suck up to 7,500MW of coal-fired electricity out of West Virginia.  Here's a PJM slide that verifies this need, as well as what the need is for.
Picture
PJM needed new transmission to address reliability problems that would develop on its system if it connected 7,500MW of new data center load in Northern Virginia.  If the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.  While PJM's job is to keep the lights on by making sure power flows throughout the region when needed, PJM's only tool to get the job done is transmission.  PJM cannot order new generation to be built, and Virginia is taking advantage of that.  Virginia considers itself a "clean" state and passed a "Clean Economy Act" that relies on importing more and more coal-fired power from West Virginia.  It's okay for Virginia to pollute our state, but not their own.  West Virginia is just their dirty little energy colony.  It's time to stand up and say enough is enough!

MARL is located in West Virginia simply because West Virginia is in the way of the extension cord from 502 Junction to Loudoun's data center alley.  There's no way to get West Virginia generated electricity to those Virginia data centers without destroying West Virginia along the way.  NextEra doesn't care about that.  They're going to make billions!  Virginia doesn't care about that.  They're also going to make billions in new tax revenue if they can build new data centers powered by West Virginia coal imported via gigantic transmission extension cords.

Kaitlyn made much of MARL connecting to an existing substation at the Mineral/Allegeny border.  That substation is called Black Oak.  It's been there for decades.  MARL needs to connect there for what PJM calls "voltage support."  When transmission lines are long and don't connect anywhere along their path (such as a line from 502 Junction to Goose Creek) they can get unstable and need injection of reactive power along the way to maintain the correct voltage.  MARL is connecting with Black Oak to suck power out of that substation in order to stabilize its voltage, not to deliver power to either county.  PJM has stated that there will be no new substations planned along MARL's route.  MARL isn't for West Virginia, or any community along the way.  MARL's entire capacity is already called for by data centers in Loudoun County, VA.  There is no way for West Virginia to benefit from additional substations.  That's not how new demand is planned.  

In order to plan to build new load in any location, there has to be an actual customer who requests electric service.  No utility (or PJM) plans to build power lines or generators with the hope that doing so would attract new load.  All utility infrastructure must be used and useful to the consumers who pay for it.  So, a real data center must request electric service in your county.  Then the utility that serves your county must evaluate whether they can serve the load with the existing system.  If so, the new load is connected.  If not, then the utility sends a load request up to PJM, who includes that in their next transmission planning load forecast.  This is exactly how MARL was planned.  It wasn't planned for us, it was planned for data centers in Virginia.

Kaitlyn's blathering about congestion and reliability in West Virginia avoids the real issue... connecting more data center load in Virginia is what destabilizes the system because Virginia is not also connecting more electric generation to match its load request.  There are only congestion and reliability issues in West Virginia if those data centers in Virginia are connected.  If West Virginia doesn't approve MARL, then those data centers will have to wait longer to be connected, or will simply go elsewhere that has available power.  PJM will not connect new data centers that will cause blackouts on the system.  PJM's first job is to maintain the reliability of the existing system.

Kaitlyn tries to pull a fast one on these radio hosts and listeners.  She says that everyone's goal is to minimize overall impacts.  This presumes that everyone agrees that MARL must be built.  West Virginians do NOT agree it needs to be built, or that MARL is a fait accompli.  West Virginians believe that this project is not logical or helpful to West Virginia and that it can be stopped!

Kaitlyn prattles on about paralleling existing transmission lines as a least impactful solution.  That's only if you don't live near those existing lines.  Where's the equity in property impacts between those properties already doing their part to host unwanted public infrastructure and the rest of us who don't have to do anything to help?  Paralleling existing transmission lines is actually MORE impactful because it cannot deviate around homes or other land uses like a line sited on unburdened land.  Paralleling is only "better" in the minds of transmission executives and PJM planners who think landowners who live next to existing easements will be a push over.  How about now?  How about one of the biggest waves of transmission opposition in PJM history?  Is paralleling still such a great idea?  It's not.  It's an idea that needs to die.

MARL will cost West Virginians hundreds of millions of dollars.  Kaitlyn really needs to find out how those rates are set.  This is the second time she's told a lie about the state utility commissions setting rates for MARL.  Even after she was invited to her own company's annual formula rate update meeting! Maybe she's just playing dumb so she can lie with a straight face?  Transmission rates are set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.  State utility commissions have no jurisdiction to set those rates and must pass them through to their state consumers unscathed.  Kaitlyn needs to stop making me think she's dumb as a box of rocks and perhaps get some training about transmission cost allocation and rates.

The only way we're going to get to the bottom of this is to keep digging!
0 Comments

Take Back Your Power, West Virginia!

8/5/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
For years, West Virginia has been the target of big green lawsuits, and the butt of arrogantly rude jokes.  Our state has mined coal, burned coal, and exported the electricity produced for more than 100 years.  West Virginia is one of only two consistent electric power exporters in our PJM Interconnection grid region.  States to our east, however, have adopted their own "clean energy" legislation that causes fossil fuel electric generation within their borders to close, such as the Virginia Clean Economy Act.  However, these "clean" states have no qualms about importing increasing amounts of dirty coal-fired electricity from West Virginia though.  Virginia's plan to supply its "clean" economy with electricity relies on increased imports of electricity from West Virginia.

Virginia's economy has created "data center alley," the largest concentration of data centers in the world.  The whole world!  And Virginia has been powering them with our dirty coal-fired power from West Virginia.  This is what has made Loudoun County, Virginia, the wealthiest county in the nation.  The whole nation!

And there Virginia sits, sneering at West Virginia and making jokes about how we're at the bottom of many state achievement lists and maligning us as a bunch of hillbillies who actually LIKE being trodden by Virginia's polished boots on our neck.  If there's something the "civilized" in Northern Virginia want that comes with impacts, they look right away to West Virginia as their sacrifice zone.

Today's West Virginia is DONE with that!

Now Virginia wants to build out a network of AI data centers, the largest in the world.  But Virginia also doesn't want to have the infrastructure necessary to power those data centers in their own back yard.  Virginians would yell and scream about the protection of their environment, while demanding that the infrastructure they don't want be moved to West Virginia.

Instead of building the infrastructure to power the data centers Virginia wants near the load they are creating, Virginia is playing a coy game with regional grid operator PJM Interconnection.  They simply encourage new AI data centers to make load requests to Virginia public utility Dominion Energy.  Dominion sends these impossible load forecasts up to PJM Interconnection, and PJM uses the only tool at its disposal to meet the load request of a public utility... transmission!  PJM does not and cannot order the construction of new generation.  It can only plan and order transmission, and that's exactly what it's done... planned and ordered new transmission extension cords from West Virginia's coal-fired power plants to serve the new AI data centers in Virginia.  West Virginia's public utilities, owned by corporations based in Ohio, are thrilled with this arrangement because they not only make money selling more electricity produced in West Virginia, they also rake in billions of dollars building new transmission extension cords.

This has to STOP!

AI data centers can be built practically anywhere that there is power and water available.  They don't need to be located within Northern Virginia's data center alley.  AI data centers could actually be built in West Virginia, in communities that want them and their tax revenue.  That's exactly what West Virginia's elected officials were thinking this year when they passed The Power Generation and Consumption Act (aka HB 2014).  However, it seems that data companies are hardly beating a path to our door.  Instead, there was a big announcement recently where Pennsylvania became the home to many new data centers in the planning stage. 

Apparently it takes *more* than just allowing data centers to build their own generation.  And it's all about who pays!  West Virginia's Power Generation and Consumption Act makes the data center pay to build its own power.  Other states simply push the service requests up to PJM interconnection, who orders new transmission that electric consumers pay for.  West Virginia is also a vertically integrated state where utilities own generation, transmission and distribution.  Generation built by our utilities is paid for by West Virginians.  When data centers get built in other states, West Virginians end up footing the bill to power them!  Frankly, that is OUTRAGEOUS!

After all these years, West Virginia finally has something other states want.  West Virginia needs to quit giving it away and being satisfied with the crumbs left from the other state feasts.

Take back your power, West Virginia!  Don't allow new transmission extension cords that drain our power to be built in West Virginia!  West Virginia has the final say whether new transmission extension cords are built in West Virginia.  If West Virginia keeps allowing other states to siphon off our power, there's nothing here to attract data centers.  They'll locate in surrounding states and suck all our power out of West Virginia.

Say NO to new transmission extension cords providing OUR power to surrounding parasitic states!  If we keep feeding new data centers in Virginia, they never have any reason to build here instead.   Keep our power here, providing economic development to our own state.

Take back your power, West Virginia! Say NO to new transmission extension cords across our beautiful state!
0 Comments

What's a Transmission Open House?

7/29/2025

4 Comments

 
Picture
Yesterday, landowners in Virginia began receiving letters from FirstEnergy's transmission group with information about the first of several transmission extension cords ordered by regional grid operator PJM Interconnection to power Loudoun County's data centers with West Virginia generated coal-fired electricity.  The letters also invited landowners to several "Open House" meetings to be held along the project route in mid-August.
Tuesday, August 12, 2025
6:00-8:00 P.M.
Lovettsville, VA

Lovettsville Volunteer Fire Hall
12837 Berlin Turnpike
Lovettsville, VA 20180

Wednesday, August 13, 2025
6:00-8:00 P.M.
Shepherdstown, WV

Shepherd University Wellness Center
164 University Drive
Shepherdstown, WV 25443
​
Thursday, August 14, 2025
6:00-8:00 P.M.
Winchester, VA

Museum of the Shenandoah Valley
901 Amherst Street
​Winchester, VA 22601
If you didn't get a letter (yet), you can read the letter by downloading this file.  Sorry, but FirstEnergy is withholding access to its website until August 12.  Be sure to mark that down to include in your comments to the Public Service Commission... withholding of information and insufficient time to meaningfully interact with the community during routing.
firstenergy_gdgc_open_house_letter.pdf
File Size: 1443 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

You are encouraged to attend these Open House meetings to get more information and to ask questions, lots of questions.  Feel free to attend any (or ALL) of the meetings, but the meetings will be identical.  So, if you forget to ask a question, or need more information, hit repeat the next night at a new location.

The Open House meetings for transmission projects are always the same format, and I've been to lots of them.  It's NOT a "Town Hall" or other form of meeting with a formal information presentation with designated speakers followed by a Q&A for everyone at the meeting to take turns asking questions.  Instead, these meetings are a place for individuals to hunt for little bits of information at certain "stations" set up around the room.  Bring your Sherlock Holmes outfit, not a prepared speech.  It's pure divide and conquer.  Each station will cover a specific topic and be staffed by one or more FirstEnergy subject matter "experts".  You are supposed to enter the room and sign in to give FirstEnergy all your contact information so that their land agents have an easier time harassing you in the future.  Then you are supposed to filter through and interact with each station set up along the perimeter of the room like cattle in a chute.  When you finally get to the end of the stations (back where you began) you will be asked to fill out a comment card and let FirstEnergy know what you think about the project.  This is a diagram of their set up:
Picture
There is no place for you to make a public comment to all the meeting attendees, so don't bother writing one.  Instead, you will talk one-on-one with FirstEnergy employees and contractors.  If you insist on having a moment and making a shouted announcement to all the attendees inside, count on FirstEnergy to have security at the meeting who will escort you out.

Open House meetings are loud and confusing.  There are hundreds of people talking at once in a confined space.  It is extremely hard to hear what anyone is saying, even someone right next to you.

Sometimes, the companies go all out and provide food, drink and freebie souveniers, such as keychains, notebooks, or cheap Chinese Yeti knockoffs with their project name on them.  FirstEnergy ain't having none of that at the Maryland meetings for Gore-Doubs-Goose Creek (aka MARL).  There will be nothing for you except paper handouts.  Not even a drink of water.  Bring your own so you can stay hydrated.  It's been hot out there!

And speaking of hot out there... feel free to stage a protest outside the Open House meeting.  Wave signs, sing songs, chant, but don't block the entrance or waylay people on their way inside.  They'll probably be back to join you after getting their own dose of "information" from inside.  Get to know other people in your community who are also affected by the transmission project.  Exchange contact information.  Create a petition against the project for people to sign.  But remember, keep it peaceful and don't interfere with what FirstEnergy is doing inside.  Sorry I won't see you there, but we can talk afterwards.

Here are some photos from FirstEnergy's June Open House in Montgomery County, Maryland.  
4 Comments

And YOU Get a Substation, and YOU Get a Substation, and...

6/15/2025

0 Comments

 
YOU get a substation!  Everyone gets a substation!
Picture
Has NextEra promised you a substation?  Has another transmission company that wants to run a transmission line through your county or district offered you a substation?  Does your county actually NEED a new substation, or is it being promised as a speculative draw for new data centers or industry in your county?

Talk is cheap.  Reality is expensive.  Really, really expensive.  A new 500kV substation costs around $50M to build.  Even looping MARL (or another new line) through an existing substation in your county costs about $20M.  Who do you think is going to pay for that?  If there's no actual NEED for a new substation, your county or district is going to pay for that.  All of a sudden, it doesn't sound like such a bargain, does it?  After all, your county doesn't have $50M to invest in speculative infrastructure to attract new businesses, does it?

All those promises about NextEra "dropping a substation" in your county or district are likely not only false promises, they are actually ludicrous to anyone who knows anything about how transmission is planned and built.  Don't parade your lack of knowledge around like a blinking beacon.  It's time to look your gift horse in the mouth.  It's just not happening.

Here's the reality about how transmission lines (and substations connected to them) are planned.  In the case of the MARL 500kV transmission project, the NEED came from increased load requests in the Dominion Power zone in Northern Virginia.  Dominion could not serve all the requests it had received to hook up new data center proposals in its service territory.  Dominion's load forecast is made up of actual requests from customers, not speculative requests from politicians or local county planners.  Only electric companies that serve actual customers can add new service requests that become part of the electric company's load forecast at PJM.  If there is no actual customer or NEED for new service, it doesn't go into the load forecast and it doesn't get to PJM. 

Those new service requests at Dominion got added to Dominion's load forecast that was sent to PJM.  In response, PJM opened a new proposal window to serve that need using the transmission system.  MARL was one of the proposals that is purposed to provide 7,500MW of new electricity imports from coal-fired plants in northern West Virginia.  Dominion and its future data center customers are counting on that new extension cord to build.  Those customer requests were made several years ago and cannot be connected until the transmission line is built.  Customers in Northern Virginia can expect to wait up to seven years to get service (if the project is built on time).

If a new data center wants to locate in Hampshire County, West Virginia, it would first make a new service request to the local electricity provider, Potomac Edison.  Potomac Edison would make a determination if it could serve the new customer using the existing system.  If not, Potomac Edison would add the new request to its load forecast that feeds up to PJM for transmission solutions.  However, that new service request would become part of a new planning window, it would not simply "jump the line" to take service away from customers waiting for service in Northern Virginia.

However, if there is no customer in Hampshire, and no new service request for Potomac Edison to serve, Potomac Edison would not add speculative load to its forecast.  The utilities only build the service we actually need.  They don't overbuild their systems based on speculation or political promises.  That's because new transmission and substations are paid for by ALL Potomac Edison customers, and for lines (and substations) 500kV and above, the costs are actually allocated to all consumers in PJM's 13-state region.  Utilities can only charge ratepayers for infrastructure that is used and useful to them.  It cannot charge ratepayers for speculative projects that don't even have a user.

So, where did NextEra's substation promises come from?  Most likely from lobbyists... those sweet talkers who will promise elected officials anything they want to hear in exchange for getting what the company wants.

MARL was originally planned to begin at the 502 Junction substation in Greene Co., Pennsylvania.  It was an unbroken "fly over" transmission line until it reached Frederick County, Virginia, more than 100 miles to the southeast.  There, MARL would build a new 500kV substation to connect MARL with the existing 500kV transmission line called Bismark-Doubs.  That new substation has been named Woodside.  From Woodside, both the existing Bismark-Doubs and the new 500kV MARL line will continue east another 60 miles or so until they connect with an existing 500kV substation in Loudoun County's "data center alley" called Goose Creek.
Picture
However, when transmission lines have really long spans between connecting substations, they can lose voltage.  Transmission system owner FirstEnergy noticed that the long span between 502 Junction and Woodside was going to cause unacceptable voltage drop, so they proposed to PJM that the line not simply bypass its existing Black Oak substation as originally planned, but connect there instead on its way east.  According to PJM, the loop into Black Oak is to provide voltage support to the MARL line.  It is NOT to serve new customers in Allegany County, Maryland, as it may have been sold to them in order to gain their support for MARL.  It will actually be taking power from Black Oak, not delivering it.

But, since the Black Oak connection worked so well to snow Allegany County elected officials that they were "getting something" in exchange for hosting the transmission line, perhaps NextEra simply couldn't resist using the same tactic on other elected officials in other impacted communities?  Next thing you know, everyone gets a substation!  And they're just going to "drop" out of the sky, like magic... free magic!  Do these elected officials think that NextEra is paying for all these free, unneeded substations?  Sorry, NextEra has a hard cost cap on the MARL project.  Any freebies they give away are coming out of NextEra's profits.  Also, an unneeded substation is unlikely to be permitted by state regulators.  PJM would have to testify that such a substation is NEEDED and, as as explained above, there is no NEED.  As well, NextEra doesn't serve any end use customers in West Virginia and never will.  Any new service request would be made to Potomac Edison.

In fact, when I asked PJM's planners about the possibility of a substation being "dropped" in Hampshire County (or any other county on MARL's route) I was told that there's currently no plan to do that.  In fact, PJM said that any new customers in those counties would have to make a request to the local electricity provider (Potomac Edison) before anything was planned.  Now go back where we started and read again about how new transmission and substations are planned to serve new customers.

There are currently NO PLANS for new substations to be "dropped" along MARL's route.  Anyone who believes that had best check their facts.  

A new substation is not any more likely than the promises of millions of dollars of new property tax revenue and jobs, jobs, jobs.  It's just not happening.  Oprah can give away cars, but NextEra cannot give away substations.  Don't look like a fool.
0 Comments

FirstEnergy Transmission Open House

6/5/2025

2 Comments

 
Picture
Ever feel like the filling in a tuna sandwich?  The "stuff" inside an Oreo?  Well, that's exactly what you are if you're on the Jefferson County section of PJM's 502 Junction to Goose Creek transmission project.  We're being sandwiched between NextEra's MARL on the western side, and FirstEnergy's Gore-Doubs-Goose Creek project on the eastern side.  We're the one remaining area without any maps or information.  Apparently we're being saved for last because we're the ones FirstEnergy is most worried about.  We're the ones who are supposed to remain compliant and in the dark because FirstEnergy has not given us any notice.  Well, wake up folks, this is your notice!
Picture
FirstEnergy has finally emerged from their bat cave to disseminate public information about the eastern half of the project.  As I told you several weeks ago, FirstEnergy is calling the eastern half of MARL the melodious Gore-Doubs-Goose Creek project.  You can continue to call it MARL if you like.  It doesn't matter what you call it, as long as you don't call it late for the financial incentives buffet (haw, haw, haw).

But, FirstEnergy is only willing to share information about the Maryland part of its project, and says it wants to file an application with the Maryland PSC by the end of the year.

Despite PJM's empty promises about "using existing rights of way" for eastern MARL, FirstEnergy is planning to expand existing easements and acquire more property.
While the project is mainly using existing rights-of-way, there are “some limited areas” where the rights-of-way will have to be expanded to accommodate new transmission structures, according to the fact sheet.
Fact sheet?  What fact sheet?  Maybe it's on their website?  What website?  The only information you're going to get is going to be in person at the ONE and ONLY "Open House" FirstEnergy is holding for this project.

A public information session on the project is scheduled for June 11 from 6 to 8 p.m. at the Upper Montgomery County Volunteer Fire Department in Beallsville.


This is your only chance to get information.  Be there.

Meanwhile FirstEnergy continues to slink around, approaching landowners with predatory proposals before giving them complete information about the project.
Potomac Edison has “approached a handful of property owners in those areas (a mix of commercial or privately owned, undeveloped land) to discuss obtaining those easements for fair market compensation.”

Right now, Potomac Edison is conducting “preconstruction activities” along the transmission rights-of-way, according to the project fact sheet.
​
Company employees might be seen driving or walking the properties where the rights-of-way are, taking measurements, placing boundary flags, and gathering soil or vegetation samples.
Don't just sit there.  Do something!
2 Comments

West Virginians Could Pay More than $440M for New Transmission Lines

5/30/2025

1 Comment

 
Picture
A new study released May 29 found that West Virginia electric consumers will pay hundreds of millions of dollars for new transmission lines ordered by regional grid operator PJM Interconnection to export power produced in West Virginia to new data centers in Northern Virginia. The study was performed by Cathy Kunkel, an energy consultant with the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).

The study focuses on the proposed 500kV MidAtlantic Resiliency Link and the 765kV Valley Link transmission projects that are planned by PJM to cross Jefferson County, but have not yet been permitted or constructed. If approved by the West Virginia Public Service Commission, the projects will increase electric bills in the state by more than $440M, according to IEEFA.

"The possibility that West Virginia ratepayers will be paying over $440 million to subsidize Virginia's insane energy policies highlights the ludicrous nature of our regional energy transmission system. Mountaineers should not pay for Virginia's decision to eliminate their coal and natural gas plants. West Virginia needs to keep our energy to build our economy, not Virginia's. If Virginia wants to change it's policies and buy coal and natural gas, we'd be happy to sell them as much as they can afford. Our beautiful state should not see ugly transmission lines forced upon us to power Virginia data centers”, said West Virginia Delegate Bill Ridenour, R–Jefferson, after reviewing the study.

The transmission lines were proposed as a fix for rapidly growing electricity demand for new data centers in Northern Virginia, according to local transmission expert Keryn Newman, who likened the new lines to enormous electric extension cords for the data centers that don’t provide any benefit to West Virginians and instead scar our landscape, take our property, and send us the bill.

“New transmission lines crossing West Virginia to export our electricity to data centers in Virginia are going to cost West Virginians at least $440M in increased electric bills at a time when they can least afford it. We need to keep our electricity here, working to empower West Virginia’s economy and its citizens. We can’t afford these new transmission extension cords,” said Newman.

Mary Gee, a resident of Summit Point whose land and home may be taken to make way for the new transmission lines is troubled by the IEEFA report. 

“It’s bad enough that my family may lose our home of 20 years, but to be forced to pay for that destruction through higher electric bills is salt in the wound,” she said.

More information about the IEEFA Study. 

1 Comment

Checking NextEra's Math

5/22/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic, designated entity for the MidAtlantic Resiliency Link, or MARL, project recently announced its Actual Net Revenue Requirement and Annual True-up Meeting.  The meeting will be held on June 12 at 3:30 p.m. and probably won't last more than an hour (depending on how many questions you ask).   Interested parties can attend via Webex or telephone.  NextEra requests that you répondez s'il vous plaît, but it's not required.  See meeting notice linked above.

An interested party is defined in NextEra's Formula Rate Protocols (PJM OATT Attachment H-33-A). 
"For purposes of these protocols, the term Interested Party includes, but is not limited to, customers under the PJM Tariff, state utility regulatory commissions, consumer advocacy agencies, and state attorneys general."  If you pay an electric bill in the PJM region, NextEra's transmission costs are flowing through into your bill and therefore you are an interested party by definition.  This issue has been litigated before FERC many times and FERC has emphatically found every time that consumers are interested parties.

At the meeting, NextEra will be presenting its Formula Rate Update to true up its estimated 2024 revenue requirement with its actual expenditures.  It will also be presenting its estimate of its revenue requirement for 2025. 

What's a revenue requirement?  It's the total amount NextEra gets to collect from ratepayers in the PJM region for each year.  Once NextEra calculates its revenue requirement, PJM collects that amount from responsible load serving entities (LSE -- the company that actually sends you your bill).  The LSE in turn collects the transmission rate from you in your bill.  This is how the costs of new transmission get included in your monthly electric bill.

NextEra will NOT be discussing or entertaining any questions about its transmission projects.  This meeting is ONLY about NextEra's transmission formula rates.

What's a formula rate?  It's a series of mathematical calculations into which the utility plugs certain numbers.  It calculates the utility's annual revenue requirement.  Formula rates take the place of a stated rate, which is a set dollar amount that the utility would collect from its customers.  Instead of a set number, the regulator sets a formula for calculating yearly rates so that there doesn't need to be a full blown rate case every year.  The formula is the rate, not a fixed number.  The revenue requirement can therefore fluctuate from year to year.

Now take a deep breath.  

This is NextEra's formula rate, populated with numbers from 2024.

It's not as hard as it looks.  Each calculation names where the numbers it plugs in come from.  The numbers used come from NextEra's FERC Form No. 1.

The Form No. 1 is an accounting of NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic's finances for 2024 that is organized into various accounts.  If you've ever worked in accounting, or taken an accounting course, you know that an entity's finances are organized into certain accounts that describe each general class of expense.  The list of descriptive accounts for an entity is called its Chart of Accounts.  All utilities regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission use FERC's Chart of Accounts, called the Uniform System of Accounts (USofA).  Each account listed on the Form No. 1 (and transferred to the formula rate) has a description and rules for its use.  Not every account in the USofA gets transferred to the formula rate template.  Only certain accounts are included in the formula rate.  Other accounts are not included in the rate.  For instance, FERC Account Number 426.4, Expenditures for certain civic, political and related activities, is not included in a formula rate.  That's because those kinds of expenses are not recoverable from ratepayers under FERC's accounting rules.  A utility that chooses to make those kind of expenditures pays for them out of its own funds. 
When a utility does not follow the descriptions and rules, this can happen.

Sometimes, utility accountants accidentally record expenses in an incorrect account.  Not a problem if both accounts are either recoverable or non-recoverable.  However if a non-recoverable expense is accidentally recorded in a recoverable account, it would get transferred to the formula rate and recovered from ratepayers in error.  In that case, the utility must refund that expense to ratepayers.

NextEra will also be discussing its projections for 2025.  These numbers are based on historic averages or company budgets.  The estimated revenue requirement is what will be recovered from ratepayers in 2025.  However, it is just an estimate.  This estimate will be compared with actual 2025 expenses in 2026 (called a true-up) and any overage will be refunded, or any under collection will be wrapped into the next year's rate.  This way, the utility only collects its actual expenditures from ratepayers.

As an interested party, you will be able to ask about specific numbers that are plugged into the formula rate, the accounts included in that line item, and how the actual expenses were classified for accounting purposes.  If the utility cannot provide detailed answers during the meeting, there is a process for interested parties to submit information requests to seek more details about the expenses and/or calculations to make sure that the rate was calculated correctly.  If you are not satisfied with the answer you receive to your question, feel free to ask them how to submit additional written information requests.

Yes, this is heady stuff, but it can be mastered by regular people.  Having an accounting background helps.

You might wonder why this process exists.  Doesn't FERC check NextEra's math when they file their annual revenue requirement?  The answer is NO.  No, they do not.  FERC relies on the entities that pay these rates to examine and question them.  Occasionally FERC may audit some of these utilities, but that's a random process that never looks at every one filed.  Because the formula rate has been determined to be just and reasonable, FERC assumes that the utility that uses it follows all the rules when it fills out the rate template every year.  Therefore, FERC doesn't need to even look at the filings.  They leave that job to you.  You might think that your LSE or your state regulator or other state office reviews these filings for accuracy.  NO.  No, they do not.  Your electric company just pays the bill to PJM and passes these costs on to you.  It doesn't care how much they are.  Your state offices usually don't have the skills or resources to review formula rate filings.  In a lot of cases, they don't understand them at all.  That leaves it up to you...

So, if you want to plunge into NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic's annual transmission revenue requirement to check their math, don't miss the meeting.  It's your first step.
0 Comments

Just Say NO To Utility Representatives Sneaking Around Jefferson County

4/16/2025

1 Comment

 
We've had multiple reports recently that FirstEnergy (possibly masquerading as your local electric company, Potomac Edison) has been sneaking around Jefferson County, knocking on doors and trying to get landowners to sign permission forms allowing the utility to perform its "surveys" outside the existing easement, on the landowner's property instead.  It has also been reported that people are being approached by telephone.

One person even reported that the utility representative said the company would be seeking to expand its easement and he would be delivering an offer soon.

Just say NO!

You are not required to permit the company on your property... and that is why they need your permission to do it.  Don't give away your property rights like that!

What's a survey?  In addition to the normal metes and bounds survey you're probably thinking about, transmission developers also want to do environmental, historic, cultural, and geotechnical surveys.  The environmental surveys are looking for the presence of certain bats, or turtles, or other endangered species.  They are also looking for wetlands and other land features.  They are looking for historic resources.  They want to dig and perform archeological surveys.  And they want to bring large equipment on your property and drill core samples to see if it's possible to anchor a giant transmission tower foundation 30 feet down.  Sometimes, they need to cut trees and vegetation to get a line of sight (or so they've told the landowner).  If you want to open your property up to a parade of people using it for transmission development surveys, then go ahead and sign their form.  Otherwise, tell them to get lost and come back when they have a permit from the West Virginia Public Service Commission (WV PSC) in their hand.

FirstEnergy does NOT have a permit from the WV PSC at this time.  In fact, FirstEnergy has not yet even applied for a permit.  In order to apply for a permit, the company is required to undertake community engagement (dissemination of project information to the public such as meetings, routes and maps, newspaper articles, a website, informational mailers).  FirstEnergy hasn't even done that yet.  Instead, it wants to divide and conquer landowners, keep them isolated and uninformed, and get them to sign away their rights for pennies on the dollar.

Why is FirstEnergy so afraid of us?  Because last time they tried to build an unneeded transmission line here, they lost!  There's power in numbers and information sharing between neighbors.  There's power in grassroots community opposition, and we need to circle the wagons to keep our community safe.  Don't let FirstEnergy's representatives cut you from the herd and isolate you from your neighbors.  Tell them to stop calling and/or get off your property until they have a permit to build their transmission line from the WV PSC.

There's a rhythm to planning and building a new (or even re-built) transmission project.  The FIRST thing the utility usually does in your local community is schmooze your local elected officials and try to get them on their side.  That ship has sailed here in Jefferson -- we beat them to the County Commission and FirstEnergy has provided absolutely ZERO information to our local government. 

​The SECOND thing the utility usually does is to schedule what it calls "Open House" public information "meetings."  They really think one trip around this room is all it takes to turn you from transmission skeptic to transmission advocate!
Picture
FirstEnergy has not announced any public meetings yet.  In fact, there's no indication that it ever will happen at all. It seems FirstEnergy has skipped some steps because contacting landowners and asking for permission to survey typically comes AFTER these meetings, the publication of a website, news articles, and community notification through postcards or other mailers.

What kind of dirty deeds and misinformation is FirstEnergy spreading in our community that can't stand the sunlight of public scrutiny?

Over the years, I've assisted communities on so many transmission projects that I've come to know the "utility playbook" for ramming a new transmission project through a resistant community by heart.  However, it seems the utility has updated their playbook lately, and I'm gonna call it "Utility Playbook - Desperation Volume 2.0".  The new volume dispenses with public information and preys on landowners (that's right, I said PREYS) to get then to sign away their rights before they have necessary information to make a reasoned decision.

There's another community to our north in Pennsylvania that seems to be experiencing an identical transmission project information desert populated by the same shady characters approaching landowners and saying the most outrageous things, such as:
“People are trying to take approximately 5 acres of my property and giving me absolutely no information,”  she said. “They’ve called me, and they want to do a survey, but they won’t give me any information.”
Sound familiar?  Or, how about this?
“(PPL) was asking if (residents) would sign a document and if they didn’t sign the document, they couldn’t tell them about the project, I’m being told,” Walsh said. “Other people were being offered crazy low value for property.”
He said at least 10 people told him of instances like this....
Enticement to sign away your rights to get information?  That's plainly criminal.

FirstEnergy needs to pull its camel nose out from under the wall of Jefferson County's tent.  We're not stupid, and we're not for sale.  Creating an information desert is about the stupidest stunt they could perform.  They must have signed with Charles Ryan again to get such stellar advice!  I know how much FirstEnergy loves to read my blog, so here's a word to the wise.  GET BUSY WITH THE INFORMATION.  THE LONGER YOU WAIT, THE WORSE IT'S GOING TO BE.

And while we're waiting... let's hold our own informational meeting for the community!  Everyone is welcome to join us on April 29 at 7:00 p.m.!  FirstEnergy spies at the meeting will be separated from the herd and given last year's Halloween candy and bottled water from Jefferson County's underground pollution plume.  I can spot you guys a mile away.  Dork has a certain fashion sense that's impossible to hide.   See you there, everyone!
Picture
1 Comment
<<Previous

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.